Search for: "Michael McConnell"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2024, 10:55 am
I have not been deep in the weeds of the arguments about Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, unlike my constitutional law casebook coauthors: Mike Paulsen, Michael McConnell, and Will Baude. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
McConnell, Four Faces of Conservative Legal Thought (1988) 2) Mary Becker, Four Faces of Liberal Legal Thought (1988) 3) Laura Kalman, The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism, excerpts 4) Johnatha [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:32 am
Judge Michael McConnell was kind enough to host me at his home for a lovely dinner. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Smith.Radical religious liberty law professors, who at the time seemed so milquetoast, like Douglas Laycock and Michael McConnell, and far-right political actors like the Becket Fund publicly overreacted to Smith, dramatically claiming that the end of religious liberty was near. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
Indeed, at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention a few weeks ago, Judge Michael McConnell predicted that judges would not accept this argument. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
I was clerking for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor at the time and have had access to the Conference notes with the Justices’ discussions.There was a huge overreaction to the decision, fed by one-sided religious scholars like Douglas Laycock and Michael McConnell, whose article touting mandatory accommodation has been shown to be law office history more than once. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
This year, I publicly challenged Will Baude and Michael McConnell to a debate on Section 3! [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:48 am
HLR case comments are about the case, but they're also about the big ideas behind the case, and one exemplar of that is Michael McConnell's famous case comment from 1997: Institutions and Interpretation: A Critique of City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 5:12 am
(h/t Howard Bashman) The post Michael McConnell and Will Baude Debate Finding Trump Ineligible under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
Michael Rose reports for Reuters. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:59 pm
I will add that, prudentially, keeping Trump off the ballot, and infuriating his die-hard supporters, would be much worse for American democracy, anyway, than would be another term of Joe Biden as Michael McConnell pointed out in a post on this blog in response to my initial post.The post Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Marci Hamilton and Michael McConnell discussed he Founders and religious liberty at the National Constitution Center (YouTube). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:40 pm
" Stanford law Professor Michael McConnell made a similar point in our recent televised debate on Trump and Section 3. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:02 am
Ilya Somin, Steve Calabresi, Will Baude, and Michael McConnell (and see also Jonathan Adler's post citing Prof. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
Hoover Senior Fellows today include, among others, many leading economists, historians, political scientists, natural security scholars, and other academics, including law professors Richard Epstein, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Kessler, and Michael McConnell. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 1:33 pm
Michael McConnell (Stanford) and myself on the question of whether Donald Trump can be disqualified from holding public office in the future, under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
Indeed, another originalist, Michael McConnell, urges a narrow reading of Section Three out of concern for the consequences of a broad reading:Putting together my friends' broad definitions of "insurrection" and "engage," and lack of concern about enforcement procedure, I worry that this approach could empower partisans to seek disqualification every time a politician supports or speaks in support of the objectives of a political riot. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
