Search for: "Michael McConnell"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
McConnell, “Excluding Epidemiological Evidence Under FRE 702,” For The Defense 18 (June 2023) [Castile]. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Another conservative legal critic, Stanford’s Michael McConnell, suggested it is dangerous to exercise the law as laid out in the Constitution as perhaps all political protests could suffer. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:57 am
Times expressing strong disagreement with the Baude-Paulsen view of Trump’s disqualification under section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment–and aligning himself with Michael McConnell’s and Eric Segals’s critiques of the Baude-Paulsen view: “My concern is that not… Continue reading The post “When the Law Is Not a Trump Card” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Dedicated to Retired Judge Dick Posner Two of America's most prominent conservative constitutional law professors, both self-described originalists, Will Baude and Michael Paulsen, have penned a 126-page opus explaining why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies on its own terms with no enabling legislation Donald Trump and likely many others from holding office under the United States or any state. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 8:14 am
Michael McConnell, Responding About the Fourteenth Amendment, ‘Insurrection,’ and Trump” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:58 pm
Michael McConnell, Responding About the Fourteenth Amendment, "Insurrection," and Trump appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 6:15 am
”―Michael W. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
McConnell was out of the Senate for almost six weeks earlier this year after falling and hitting his head. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
But Michael Lewis (Christopher Newport University) says our understanding of the era isn’t a very accurate one. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
Michael W. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
See generally Michael W. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:00 am
Rory Bahadur (Washburn), Law School Rankings and The Impossibility of Anti-Racism Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), Legal Education's Reaction To The Supreme Court's Affirmative Action Decisions Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), Michael McConnell (Stanford) & Marcus Cole (Dean, Notre Dame), Receive Religious Liberty Awards Chronicle of Higher Education, An Outspoken Law Professor... [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Michael W. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Other scholars – Michael McConnell and Randy Picker and David Skeel and Gillette – have argued Chapter 9 bankruptcy courts should consider using their discretion in these cases to encourage or force pretty substantial reforms in municipal policy, from tax increases to moving to at-large from districted methods of electing city councilmembers. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:30 am
Jonathan Swan, Michael S. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Buchanan and Michael C. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1] At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:00 am
Those two topics appear to have virtually nothing in common, but when sophists get their grooves on, there are certain common go-to moves that they cannot resist.It seems like a million years ago at this point, but it has been barely two weeks since the editorial page of The New York Times decided to publish a guest op-ed by a conservative law professor named Michael McConnell. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:01 pm
His misanalysis is quite enlightening.Last week, I wrote a column here on Verdict in which I ridiculed a recent guest op-ed in The Times by a conservative professor named Michael McConnell, who set up one of the most transparently weak strawman arguments that I have ever seen. [read post]
