Search for: "Michael McConnell"
Results 501 - 520
of 961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
It was also at the heart of a prominent defense of Judge Hanen written by Professor Michael McConnell in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
<> Coalition Applauds Senator McConnell's Efforts to Combat President's War on Coal - Several groups wrote to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to applaud his "work with state governors and legislators to push back against the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) usurpation of state electricity policy through its proposed Clean Power Plan (CPP). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:03 am
Boehner and Obama and McConnell all have trouble making their constituencies follow a leader. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
”The instructors will be Michael McConnell, the Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, and Jack Rakove, the William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and Professor of Political Science and (by courtesy) Law at Stanford University.This seminar will combine discussion of works-in-progress by the participants (on a variety of subjects) with a focused set of conversations about religion in… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
Michael can be reached at 215.772.7211 or at mhayes@mmwr.com. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
All of that analysis, however, has been little more than academic musings for the past year or so, because in early 2014 Senator Mitch McConnell put together a deal that suspended the debt ceiling until March 15, 2015. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As Michael McConnell puts it, “the district court narrowly crafted its order not to touch on prosecutorial discretion. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:48 am
" Law professor and former Tenth Circuit Judge Michael W. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:13 am
Taking on, among others Michael McConnell, Anil Kalhan in a post on Dorf on Law carefully analyzes Judge Andrew S. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:47 am
The district court order is a preliminary injunction, meaning that it isn’t the final word in the case. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
[Will Baude, Ilya Somin, Michael McConnell] A previous high court ruling had kicked the case back to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings [earlier here and here.] [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
In fact, former director of the NSA and CIA Michael Hayden recently admitted: “We kill people based on metadata. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Michael William McConnell of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees Bard and Goldfarb, won an affirmance of a District of Arizona finding of willfulnessin patent infringement. [ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 8:40 pm
"Michael McConnell responds to questions about the raisins case": Will Baude has this post today at "The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
McConnell, John H. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:35 am
You never hear it from Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Chuck Grassley (the incoming Chairman of SJC), or Bob Goodlatte (the once-and-future Chairman of HJC). [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
” This is a similar argument that was advanced by Michael Hayden (former director of the CIA and the NSA) and Michael Mukasey (former attorney general) in an op-ed published on Monday in advance of the vote. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
.; Michael Grimm, R-N.Y.; Ann Kuster, D-N.H.; Frank LoBiondo, R-N.J.; Dave Loebsack, D-Iowa; Pat Meehan, R-Pa.; Raul Ruiz, D-Calif.; Kurt Schrader, D-Ore.; Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz.; and others. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:12 am
[Providence Journal editorial] Last fall, in a (highly recommended) Yale Law Journal piece, Stanford law professor and former appeals judge Michael McConnell proposed that the Supreme Court’s much-demonized Citizens United decision would have rested on firmer ground had the Court characterized it as a free press rather than a free speech ruling; the case arose from a complaint against the makers of a documentary critical of Hillary Clinton. [read post]
