Search for: "Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law" Results 21 - 40 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1985, the Standing Committee on Management and Members’ Services considered the existing conflict of interests laws adequate, but passed a Code, which was then amended in following years. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  For some attorneys the most nerve-wracking portion of the Mueller hearings came when Ohio Representative Michael Turner suddenly produced a copy of a criminal law textbook he said was used at the University of Virginia. [read post]
Can you reiterate the main points of Mueller’s report, and the upshots of his investigation? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm by Amy Howe
Before issuing the subpoena, committee chair Elijah Cummings sent a memorandum to other committee members in which he explained that the impetus for the subpoena was testimony by Michael Cohen, the president’s personal attorney, in February 2019, in which Cohen told members of the committee that the president’s financial statements were not accurate. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
Michael Flynn—who would later serve as National Security Advisor in the Trump Administration—recalled that Trump made this request repeatedly…” [Vol. 1, p. 62] IV. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm by Charlie Dunlap
As the Office of the Pardon Attorney reminds us, even a pardon “does not signify innocence. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mueller Suggests Only Congress Can ‘Formally Accuse a Sitting President of Wrongdoing’ Anchorage Daily News – Matt Zapotosky, Devlin Barrett, and Felicia Sonmez (Washington Post) | Published: 5/29/2019 Special counsel Robert Mueller reiterated that his office could not clear President Trump of obstructing justice, asserting in his first public remarks about his investigation that federal prosecutors cannot accuse a president of a crime. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
`Michael' Pruneda, Jr., Rolando Quintana, for Elmer DeGuzman, Yolanda Lopez, Richard Wecker and Sheryl Hamer, Respondents.Alfred John Harper, III, Arrissa K. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:04 am by Jonathan Shaub
When former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates was set to testify about her communications to the White House regarding Michael Flynn, the Justice Department responded to her letter seeking “authorization” to testify by noting that the “President owns” the privilege and indicating that she would “need[] to consult with the White House” before disclosing any privileged information. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:34 am by Scott R. Anderson
“[Hiring you] may have been [Trump’s] best move,” host Michael Isikoff joked with Cobb. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
Conduct involving FBI Director Comey and Michael Flynn. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Tim Zubizarreta
The Attorney General’s press conference began early Thursday morning with a reiteration of the conclusions released in his letter to Congress that there was “No obstruction, No Collusion. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
Candidate Trump signed a Letter of Intent for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump Organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry Peskov. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
The reactive arthritis associated with Reiter’s may develop after a person eats food that has been tainted with b [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm by Kathryn Moore
Kimberly explained that those words embody an exhaustion requirement and should have the same meaning as under Section 405(b)(1): a hearing before an administrative law judge, which occurred in this case. [read post]
Technically speaking, under federal election law, the balance Trump owed Cohen at any given time could constitute an ongoing illegal contribution by Cohen. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here, the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, the state’s chief legal officer, wrote a letter to the Division stating that “the Proposal, if adopted, would cause Johnson & Johnson to violate New Jersey state law. [read post]