Search for: "Michael Risch" Results 61 - 80 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 9:47 am by Lisa Ouellette
Guest post by Matteo Dragoni, Stanford TTLF FellowRecent posts by both Michael Risch and Lisa Ouellette discussed the recent article The Impact of International Patent Systems: Evidence from Accession to the European Patent Convention, by economists Bronwyn Hall and Christian Helmers. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:47 am by Lisa Ouellette
Guest post by Matteo Dragoni, Stanford TTLF FellowRecent posts by both Michael Risch and Lisa Ouellette discussed the recent article The Impact of International Patent Systems: Evidence from Accession to the European Patent Convention, by economists Bronwyn Hall and Christian Helmers. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:47 am by Lisa Ouellette
Guest post by Matteo Dragoni, Stanford TTLF FellowRecent posts by both Michael Risch and Lisa Ouellette discussed the recent article The Impact of International Patent Systems: Evidence from Accession to the European Patent Convention, by economists Bronwyn Hall and Christian Helmers. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:02 pm
[Dealbreaker] * Professor Michael Risch on yesterday's Bilski argument in the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:12 am by Dennis Crouch
The slot at De Paul opened when Katherine Strandburg left for NYU Michael Risch is moving from West Virginia to Villanova. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
Here's how it starts: Michael Risch's Virtual Third Parties, 25 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm by John Steele
(Disclaimer: David Hricik, one of our own, is on the brief, as are profs I know and respect like Lisa Dolak, Bill Gallagher, and Michael Risch.   [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Here's an updated list of the most downloaded IP papers that were posted on SSRN in the past 60 days:The AIA 500 Expanded: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, by Sara Jeruss, Robin Feldman & Thomas Ewing (this study of 13,000 patent cases over 4 years has gotten lots of press; see press release, Thomson Reuters, Law.com, IPWatchdog)The Securitization of Patents, by Michael Risch (see guest post by author on PatentlyO)Patent Trolls by the Numbers, by Colleen V. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:49 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
He argues that "its current diluted interpretation (anything that does anything likely has substantial utility) may stem from its separation from the underlying art," and that courts should recognize that utility is, in my co-blogger Michael Risch's words, "A Surprisingly Useful Requirement. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:35 pm
Professor Michael Risch in his post on the "Written Description" blog provides another view point, described on the draft paper Embracing Technological Similarity for the Measurement of Complexity and Patent Thickets by Charles deGrazia (U. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:04 am
In the past, this question has already been dealt with in case-law but Michael Risch (Written Description Blog) analyses a case where the question is not only on the pose itself but the possibility of it occurring in nature. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm by Calvin Massey
  For a link to Yackee's article see the earlier post on this blog by Michael Risch. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
And please welcome for the first time to Prawfs: Chad Oldfather from Marquette (judicial process), and Michael Risch from West Virginia. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 6:28 am
 Michael Risch of Written Description warmly supports this premise, and points us in the direction of a couple of interesting papers focusing on the stories of the people who innovate.On IPwatchdog, Gene Quinn asks Did the Supreme Court intentionally destroy the U.S. patent system? [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by Dan Markel
; Ashira Ostrow (Hofstra); and Michael Helfand(Pepperdine) and Michael Risch (Villanova). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:58 am by Stefanie Levine
Michael Risch of Villanova School of Law. - Gary Hoffman began with a discussion on how the Courts have reacted to Bilski.  [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:09 am by Terry Hart
Michael Risch takes a closer look at the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Folkens v Wyland Worldwide, concerning the protectability of a certain element of an image: the “pose” of two dolphins. [read post]