Search for: "Michael W. McConnell"
Results 1 - 20
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Our friend Michael McConnell offers a subtle variation of the "democracy" argument. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Edmund Burke, Reflections on the French Revolution (W. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Chapman & Michael W. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
McConnell, “Excluding Epidemiological Evidence Under FRE 702,” For The Defense 18 (June 2023) [Castile]. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 6:15 am
”―Michael W. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
Michael W. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
See generally Michael W. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Michael W. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1] At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Buchanan & Michael C. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:04 am
"Writes lawprof Michael W. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 pm
“The Case for Violating the Debt Limit Is Dangerous Nonsense”: Law professor Michael W. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:20 am
by Michael C. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:53 pm
McConnell. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Office of Personnel Management The Bulk Data for Me but Not for Thee Award: Los Angeles Police Department I Wanted to Clarify That My A** is Covered Award: White House The Transparently Proud of Destroying Public Records Awards: Michael Gableman The Ancient Art of Dodging Accountability Award: Cyber Ninjas The Transparency Tax Award: Mendocino County The Burn After Reading Award: Immigration and Customs Enforcement The MisFIRE in All Directions Award: Irvington Township (I'm Not… [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
In The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power under the Constitution, Professor Michael McConnell takes Crosskey’s observation as a starting point of his own more systematic analysis of how the Committee of Detail divided these prerogative powers between Congress and the President. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Michael W. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But the originalist scholarship is in near unanimous agreement that, as Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnell have shown, due process of law was indeed procedural: so long as rules of conduct are established by the competent authorities (legislatures) and do not otherwise violate a specific constitutional provision, and any violations of those rules are adjudicated in courts at least according to the processes established by law, there is no violation of the clause. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:08 am
Harper The Atlantic William Baude Michael W. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:11 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: The Supreme Court Has a Perfectly Good Option in Its Most Divisive Case (William Baude & Michael W. [read post]
