Search for: "Michael W. McConnell" Results 21 - 40 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2020, 7:06 pm by Howard Bashman
“Amy Coney Barrett wouldn’t transform the court more than any other justice”: Law professor Michael W. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:52 am by Paul Caron
The Stanford Constitutional Law Center, directed by Michael W. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Case for Violating the Debt Limit Is Dangerous Nonsense”: Law professor Michael W. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:59 pm by constitutional lawblogger
ConLawProf's Steven Schwinn (pictured below) is participating in an online debate/discussion with Michael W. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:08 am by firstamendmentblogger
Here is this week’s collection of newly available scholarship on religion and speech topics: 1.Michael W. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:25 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court Was Right to Block Cuomo’s Religious Restrictions; The balance between Covid-19 precautions and civil liberties doesn’t need to be a partisan issue”: Law professors Michael W. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am by Guest Blogger
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman On Thursday, Michael McConnell offered his current thoughts on the Hobby Lobbycase. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:28 pm
Kent Greenawalt of Columbia University School of Law, Judge Michael W. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
Among the panelists are Tenth Circuit Judge Michael W. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:14 pm
Often times the only thing worse than losing a Sentencing Guidelines appeal as a federal criminal defendant is winning one: Tenth Circuit Judge Michael W. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by zbrown
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by professor Michael W. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Today’s WSJ features an op-ed by former federal judge Michael McConnell on President Obama’s decision to grant recess appointments to Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Board and three members of the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Tom Smith
If liberal supporters of the health-care law were as confident of the merits of their position as they claim to be, they would offer actual legal arguments, based on text, history, structure and precedent, instead of labeling justices with whom they disagree as hypocrites and partisans. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:15 am by Tom Smith
But the Obama Justice Department has now asked the court to disavow the ministerial exception altogether. [read post]