Search for: "Michael W. McConnell" Results 121 - 140 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Griffin, Law and Religion: Cases and Materials, 3d, (Foundation Press, 2013).Michael W. [read post]
12 May 2014, 5:45 am by Bill Otis
 The first is former Attorney General and United States District Judge Michael Mukasey. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am by Guest Blogger
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman On Thursday, Michael McConnell offered his current thoughts on the Hobby Lobbycase. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
McConnell, Why Protect Religious Freedom? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm by JB
Young, Michael Greve’s Competitive Federalism and the Maturation of the Federalism DebateMichael W. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
Department of Agriculture (docket 12-123), by Michael W. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
Indeed, the scholarship of conservatives such as McConnell, Calabresi, Michael Stokes Paulsen, and Judge John T. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 9:20 pm by Hani Sarji
” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell [R-KY] and Vice President Joe Biden negotiated the current version of H.R. 8. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Tom Smith
If liberal supporters of the health-care law were as confident of the merits of their position as they claim to be, they would offer actual legal arguments, based on text, history, structure and precedent, instead of labeling justices with whom they disagree as hypocrites and partisans. [read post]