Search for: "Michael Wasserman" Results 41 - 60 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman points out that Nieves v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the Korematsu development comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[t]he dispute leaves open whether SCOTUS could review decisions by modern administrative agencies (something Congress has never purported to do). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Michael Parsons at Modern Democracy, Joey Fishkin at the Election Law Blog, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, who remarks that “[l]ike a Magic 8-Ball, the Court keeps coming up: ‘Ask again later. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am by SHG
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:22 am by Andrew Stoltmann
The post Update For Investors: Michael Gillis appeared first on Stoltmann Law. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Another account of the argument comes from Michael Bobelian at Forbes. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Kristina Hurley and Michael Iadevaia preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm by Lisa Ouellette
" Situated against the broad array of adjudicatory procedures used by other agencies (as cataloged by my colleague Michael Asimov), Walker and Wasserman argue that "the PTAB adjudicatory proceedings are not that unusual," and that the Federal Circuit is wrong to suggest that they must be governed by the APA's formal adjudication requirements. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm by Lisa Ouellette
" Situated against the broad array of adjudicatory procedures used by other agencies (as cataloged by my colleague Michael Asimov), Walker and Wasserman argue that "the PTAB adjudicatory proceedings are not that unusual," and that the Federal Circuit is wrong to suggest that they must be governed by the APA's formal adjudication requirements. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Michael Chou and Marissa Rivera preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am by Amanda Frost
Professors Samuel Bray, Michael Morley and Wasserman oppose nationwide injunctions in all or most cases. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michael Risch at WrittenDescription has a post titled Evidence of Peer Group Influence on Patent Examiners about a paper by Michael Frakes and Melissa Wasserman in SSRN in which Risch writes:I'll admit that I was skeptical upon reading the abstract. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:24 am by Michael Risch
Michael Frakes and Melissa Wasserman have gotten a lot of mileage out of their micro data set on patent examiner behavior over time. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:24 am by Michael Risch
Michael Frakes and Melissa Wasserman have gotten a lot of mileage out of their micro data set on patent examiner behavior over time. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:24 am by Michael Risch
Michael Frakes and Melissa Wasserman have gotten a lot of mileage out of their micro data set on patent examiner behavior over time. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:24 am by Michael Risch
Michael Frakes and Melissa Wasserman have gotten a lot of mileage out of their micro data set on patent examiner behavior over time. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer wonders whether Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion concurring in the judgment in part, in which she questioned the court’s unanimous 1996 holding in Whren v. [read post]