Search for: "Michaels Enterprises, Inc. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
JoLida (Property, intangible) TTAB precedential no. 10: TTAB okays opposer’s pre-trial disclosures, denies motion to strike trial testimony: Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99)   United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog)   US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum)… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 pm
The May 31 decision is Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode)   United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]