Search for: "Michigan v. Long" Results 1 - 20 of 1,884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2016, 6:16 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
People v Rea: Drunk Driving Updates with Troy Michigan Expert DUIPeople v Rea: Drunk Driving Updates with Troy Michigan Expert DUIAttorneys Recently the Michigan Court of Appeals heard a case involving an individual charged with operating while intoxicated after he drove drunk on his driveway. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher Congressional action to correct the Supreme Court’s decision in Carcieri v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Mindi M. Johnson
  Specifically, National Pride at Work v Governor held that such policies violated the Michigan Marriage Amendment (“Marriage Amendment”) by recognizing same sex domestic partnerships as analogous to a marriage or similar union. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:28 am by Timothy P. Flynn
We here at the Law Blogger knew that it would not be long before Michigan joined in the fray of what has become the civil rights issue of our time.www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am by CMLP Staff
The case does not specify how long the right of publicity extends after death, nor does it appear that subsequent cases in Michigan have addressed this question. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am by DMLP Staff
The case does not specify how long the right of publicity extends after death, nor does it appear that subsequent cases in Michigan have addressed this question. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:16 am by admin
  The post The perfect storm: Republicans to control Michigan Supreme Court for a long, long time to come appeared first on Michigan Auto Law Blog. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by Peter J. Cavanaugh
AIA, J.D.Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC On July 11, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court decided the case of Miller-Davis v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
At issue in the case is whether Michigan's affirmative action ban falls afoul of the slippery equal protection doctrine of Hunter v. [read post]