Search for: "Michigan v. Ohio" Results 1 - 20 of 997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 1:02 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and reverting to Ohio v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
State and local lawmakers can lead prayers in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan, but not in South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, or West Virginia. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Look for Judge Friedman's ruling to be appealed and consolidated with other similar federal court rulings on same-sex marriages currently pending throughout the Sixth Circuit [Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee].Meanwhile, however, game on! [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
On March 18, 2008, In Smith v Smith, decided (For Publication), the Michigan court of appeals adopted the test from an Ohio decision to determine what constitutes "cohabitation. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
The first question we'll be asked, of course, is whether a decision in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:41 pm by Sam Brunson
pic.twitter.com/mwcEymH3VY — Sam Brunson (@smbrnsn) January 23, 2019 I’ve been following Gaylor v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 12:25 am by Kurt T. Koehler
  Michigan was essentially criminalizing the sale of bottles in Ohio that have the Michigan unique mark. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:13 am by Tyler Gillett
That ruling was placed on hold by the Supreme Court prior to their June decision in Rucho v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Bd. of Commrs., 115 Ohio St. 3d 337 (2007); and in the December 4, 2008 case of State ex. rel. v Middlefield, 120 Ohio St. 3d. 313 (2008). [read post]