Search for: "Michigan v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 770
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:40 am
See Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:08 am
Now what about Texas v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm
Michigan: In Costantino v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 5:04 am
The US Supreme Court late Friday denied the motion for leave to file a complaint in Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Justice Samuel Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:40 am
In Michigan, it was illegal to “cure” ballots. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
See Bush, 531 U.S. at 112 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring, with Scalia, J. and Thomas, J.) [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
" Chiafalo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:41 pm
If Justices Thomas and Alito think that the Court really has no discretion to summarily reject state-on-state original jurisdiction cases, then unless they reject the Texas case on standing grounds, they will invite a tsunami of such litigation.And that in turn would undermine the holding of Marbury v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
Illinois v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm
The decision below (Wade v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:01 am
Holder.-- Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito: Are you kidding? [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]