Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 2,907
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:26 pm by fvanloon
Especially if you live in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona – cesspools of fraud and lawlessness all. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:46 pm by fvanloon
“In plain English, the University of Michigan appears to have created ‘whites-only’ and ‘non-whites-only’ events, in a manner reminiscent of the doctrine of racial segregation overturned by Brown v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 7:22 am by Will Baude
Indeed, as Baude and Sachs point out, "[t]he Bank of the United States no longer exists, but M'Culloch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:50 am by Irene
“In plain English, the University of Michigan appears to have created ‘whites-only’ and ‘non-whites-only’ events, in a manner reminiscent of the doctrine of racial segregation overturned by Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 8:47 pm by Matt Cooper
Many lawsuits were filed in the days around Election Day, including in the states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:01 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  "And as we all know, in the United States political system of the early 2000s, what goes around comes around. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]