Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 3,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 11:45 am by WIMS
United States Federal Circuit, Case No.13-5059. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Michigan Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Only 8 justices will partake in this case as Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself, presumably due to her involvement in the case when she was the United States Solicitor General.If Proposal 2 is held to be constitutional as the Michigan Attorney General argues [Schuette says there's nothing more equal than equality], then affirmative action is effectively dead in the water here in Michigan and, eventually, in other states. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jerry Votava
Roberts held that the government did not sufficiently prove the elements of the charges of seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and other weapons related charges in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:26 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, last month the Department of Justice dropped its appeal of the court's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
TD Ameritrade, Inc., et al., Defendants (Opinion United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan) DOJ x SEC x CFTC x ... [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:36 am by John Kang
As illustrated by Justice Kennedy’s recent majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:07 pm by Dale Burmeister
Matthews, MD, PC v Harleysville Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, Case No. 18-11659, Hon. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by stu@crimapp.com
The key holding is that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Padilla v Kentucky applies to sex offender registry consequences. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Anonymous
Federal Election Committee (558 U.S. 310) was decided by the United States Supreme Court.Facts of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm by John W. Arden
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]