Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 3:43 pm
However, the Supreme Court's relatively recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
The key holding is that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Padilla v Kentucky applies to sex offender registry consequences. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:36 am
As illustrated by Justice Kennedy’s recent majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in KENNEDY v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:26 am
As previously reported, last month the Department of Justice dropped its appeal of the court's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
Roberts held that the government did not sufficiently prove the elements of the charges of seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and other weapons related charges in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:15 am
See Myco Indust., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:07 pm
Matthews, MD, PC v Harleysville Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, Case No. 18-11659, Hon. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
Only 8 justices will partake in this case as Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself, presumably due to her involvement in the case when she was the United States Solicitor General.If Proposal 2 is held to be constitutional as the Michigan Attorney General argues [Schuette says there's nothing more equal than equality], then affirmative action is effectively dead in the water here in Michigan and, eventually, in other states. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 2:01 pm
The case was heard before the United States Supreme Court, and it was Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
See Settlement Agreement, Ahmed v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
” Jenkins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Federal Election Committee (558 U.S. 310) was decided by the United States Supreme Court.Facts of Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:14 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am
At his jury trial in Michigan state court, Lancaster asserted a defense of diminished capacity. [read post]
