Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 3,612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 9:45 am by WIMS
The United States appeals, arguing the amount of the penalty is inadequate. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm by Jon
 Clerked for United States Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.Joan Larsen -- Michigan. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 Even though the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, people still get pulled over with little justification. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
If you are being investigated by a federal grand jury or are facing federal charges, it is imperative to speak to a Michigan criminal defense lawyer who understands the federal justice system immediately. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm by ---------------------------------
On February 23, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, decided the case of In re: Quality Stores, Inc., et al., Debtors; United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:17 pm by WIMS
The United States Army used the airfield from 1942 to 1945. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by admin
The insurance industry in our post-Citizens United World now gives unlimited amounts of money to judges and justices who publicly campaign promise to overturn decisions like McCormick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has allowed a putative class action under Michigan law to proceed against several magazine publishers that allegedly sold lists of their customers’ names, addresses, and subscription choices to third parties. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm by Mark Murakami
Update:  the Supreme Court is considering the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:12 am by Steven M. Gursten
This was my analysis: if the auto insurance companies win on PIP “choice” with low protection minimums (PIP choice coverage was  only $50,000 in SB 293 and SB 294, and if the partisan Michigan Supreme Court or the Republican Michigan Legislature chooses to overturn McCormick v. [read post]