Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 3,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Westrick graduated from high school in 1979 and went to Michigan State University. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Saint Michael Academy, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm by Ilya Somin
In so doing, they placed their legal principles above any loyalty they might feel to Trump and the GOP: On Friday evening, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously rejected Texas attorney general Ken Paxton's effort to invalidate the election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This is significant because the substantive claims in Wisconsin are parallel to the substantive claims made about the elections in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania in various suits, including Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:22 pm by NBlack
This very question was at issue in a recent case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Saenz v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Join for spirited but respectful debate between Professors Chesney and Vladeck as they discuss: The legal basis for a possible presidential action to compel Pfizer to bump the United States ahead of other countries when it comes to accessing vaccine doses beyond the 100 million covered in the current contract Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to get the Supreme Court to adjudicate a claim by Texas that the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan… [read post]