Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 3,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2015, 8:16 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
City of Warren, August 21, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: New Guidelines for Identifying Causes of Newborn Brain Injury, October 21, 2014, Boston Personal Injury Lawyer Blog The post Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:27 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
But on Monday, June 15, 2020, Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch authored an historic 6-3 majority opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States providing nationwide protections for the LGBTQ community against workplace discrimination. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am by Mary Zambreno
In a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:26 am by Steven Cohen
Shah – United States District Court – Eastern District of Michigan – February 3rd, 2022) involves a 1983 claim regarding Michigan’s Newborn Screening Program. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Part II briefly surveys the history of the relationship between Indians and the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Part II briefly surveys the history of the relationship between Indians and the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm by Mark Murakami
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]