Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 3,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm by David Urban
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, covering Pennsylvania and nearby states, has recently departed from this line of authority. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am by Anna Salvatore
Their certifications are yet another blow to President Trump, who has now failed to prevent six states—including Michigan, Pennsylvania and Nevada—from certifying Biden’s victory on baseless grounds of voter fraud. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
” Apparently, the two ultimate triggers were the failure of the president’s litigation in Pennsylvania and the certification of Michigan’s votes—but even before those two events, Murphy had informed the White House that she would be starting the transition on Nov. 23. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 7:22 am by Will Baude
Indeed, as Baude and Sachs point out, "[t]he Bank of the United States no longer exists, but M'Culloch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 8:47 pm by Matt Cooper
Many lawsuits were filed in the days around Election Day, including in the states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]