Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
NOTE: The district court noted that the United States Supreme Court “has specifically declined to rule on the question of what happens to unclaimed funds in a class action. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:32 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted summary judgment to an excess insurer and held that the excess policy would not be triggered until the underlying limits were exhausted by actual payment from the primary carrier. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
Lymtal Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Crump then filed a pro se “Motion to Show Cause” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, which the court interpreted as a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Today the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 1:01 pm
Delnero A recent decision from the Eastern District of Michigan in CFPB v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 1:11 pm
United States, 308 US 343 (1939) ; United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
The same lawyers within the United States Attorney’s Office in the Western Michigan District who participated in the United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
(Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the case, presumably because she was involved in it when she was the Solicitor General of the United States.) [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:40 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Christian Investments LLC and H-D Michigan, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Harold Koh, recently returned to academia from his tenure as the Legal Advisor to the Secretary of State in the Obama administration, will chair and moderate.Moderator: Harold Hongju Koh, Yale Law SchoolSpeaker: Professor Pär Kristoffer Cassel, University of Michigan Department of HistorySpeaker: Tahirih V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Harold Koh, recently returned to academia from his tenure as the Legal Advisor to the Secretary of State in the Obama administration, will chair and moderate.Moderator: Harold Hongju Koh, Yale Law SchoolSpeaker: Professor Pär Kristoffer Cassel, University of Michigan Department of HistorySpeaker: Tahirih V. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976). [read post]
