Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 3,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Interior (Land into Trust; Alaska Tribes)United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am by bryannewland
 The same lawyers within the United States Attorney’s Office in the Western Michigan District who participated in the United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:24 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Michigan, 2020) Petitioner alleged that in January 2019, Respondent wrongfully removed Petitioner and Respondent’s two daughters, ages 9 and 10, from Mexico to the United States The Court ordered that the two children be returned to Mexico.Before January 2019, Petitioner and Respondent lived in Mexico with their two minor children. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by Madelaine Lane
Crump then filed a pro se “Motion to Show Cause” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, which the court interpreted as a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Madelaine Lane
On November 7, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one motion to disqualify Justice Markman from considering defendant’s appeal in People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:58 pm by NARF
United States (Trust Responsibilities; Continuing Claims Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
To have jurisdiction over a case, a federal court must find that the plaintiffs satisfy Article III of the United States Constitution, including by alleging that they have suffered an injury-in-fact. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:06 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
  (Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the case, presumably because she was involved in it when she was the Solicitor General of the United States.) [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]