Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 2,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 9:07 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
"Pursuant to the dictates of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), we remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
  This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Matthew Pomy
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
In its conclusion, the Appeals Court said, ". . .we dismiss Northshore's appeal, dismiss the United States' cross-appeal, and affirm the district court's conclusion that the air-emissions provisions of the injunction are moot. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:17 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
On May 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States issued their decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
In a very recent decision by the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm by Jason Shinn
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 2:15 pm
In a decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals made on December 20th, Darryl Willard Cain, the defendant-appellant, had his argument that convictions for carjacking and unlawfully driving away in a motor vehicle violated both the Michigan and United States Constitutions rejected. [read post]