Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 3,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANASOUTH BEND DIVISIONROBERT BROWN, Plaintiff vs. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
Jeremy Fisher United States Supreme Court No. 09-91 Decided: December 7, 2009 The United States Supreme Court issued a per curium decision on December 7 regarding a Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Suzanne Ito
Today, the United States is the only country in the world that that allows child offenders to be locked away for life. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
  This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:55 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in favor of a narrow statutory holding stating that video-on-demand is... [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am by stu@crimapp.com
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear two Michigan habeas corpus cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Matthew Pomy
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
In its conclusion, the Appeals Court said, ". . .we dismiss Northshore's appeal, dismiss the United States' cross-appeal, and affirm the district court's conclusion that the air-emissions provisions of the injunction are moot. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:07 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
"Pursuant to the dictates of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), we remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]