Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 2,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Apprendi v New Jersey, the Court held that a State could not avoid the reasonable doubt standard by shifting elements of a criminal offense to the sentencing phase. ...Last year, I blogged about a United States Supreme Court rolling called Alleyne v United States, 570 US ___; 133 S Ct 2151; 186 L Ed 2d 314 (2013), which I thought was the last nail in this flawed argument’s “coffin. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Suzanne Ito
Today, the United States is the only country in the world that that allows child offenders to be locked away for life. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am by stu@crimapp.com
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear two Michigan habeas corpus cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Matthew Pomy
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
  This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:07 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
"Pursuant to the dictates of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), we remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:55 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in favor of a narrow statutory holding stating that video-on-demand is... [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
In its conclusion, the Appeals Court said, ". . .we dismiss Northshore's appeal, dismiss the United States' cross-appeal, and affirm the district court's conclusion that the air-emissions provisions of the injunction are moot. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:11 pm by stu@crimapp.com
Last month we reported that the United States Supreme Court took two Attorney General appeals from the Sixth Circuit’s grant of habeas corpuses. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:17 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
On May 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States issued their decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]