Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Alshdaifat is charged in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 2:15 pm
In a decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals made on December 20th, Darryl Willard Cain, the defendant-appellant, had his argument that convictions for carjacking and unlawfully driving away in a motor vehicle violated both the Michigan and United States Constitutions rejected. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
United States, the D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
That was illegal in Michigan under Koski v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, better known as [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
” Mich United Conservation Clubs v Anthony, 90 Mich App 99, 109; 280 NW2d 883 (1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:08 am
Here is the pleading in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Enbridge has countered Michigan’s demand with an action for declaratory and injunctive relief before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division (Federal Court), arguing that the state lacks the authority to terminate the Line 5 easement as the matter falls under federal jurisdiction under the Pipeline Safety Act. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:03 pm
Therefore, under the state statutory-construction law, the Michigan state court had adequate and independent state law ground to uphold 2014 PA 282 and the Supreme Court of the United States does not have the jurisdiction to overturn it. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
.' See Kleissler v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
District Court Judge Bernard Friedman issued an opinion and order declaring Michigan's state constitutional ban to be a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the United States Constitution.In conjunction with Governor Snyder, Michigan's Attorney General has aggressively pursued the state's appellate options in the DeBoer same-sex marriage and adoption case. [read post]
