Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:32 pm
Oral Argument in case# 10-3891; State of Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
United States, the D.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
That was illegal in Michigan under Koski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, better known as [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
” Mich United Conservation Clubs v Anthony, 90 Mich App 99, 109; 280 NW2d 883 (1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
District Court Judge Bernard Friedman issued an opinion and order declaring Michigan's state constitutional ban to be a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the United States Constitution.In conjunction with Governor Snyder, Michigan's Attorney General has aggressively pursued the state's appellate options in the DeBoer same-sex marriage and adoption case. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:08 am
Here is the pleading in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Enbridge has countered Michigan’s demand with an action for declaratory and injunctive relief before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division (Federal Court), arguing that the state lacks the authority to terminate the Line 5 easement as the matter falls under federal jurisdiction under the Pipeline Safety Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:46 am
Under the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution are incorporated, and apply to state governments. [read post]
