Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 2,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am by stu@crimapp.com
Smith, the Sixth Circuit ruled that the Michigan Supreme Court acted contrary to clearly established United States Supreme Court law when it rejected a Sixth Amendment challenged the racial composition of Mr. ... [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:58 am
Other members of this conspiracy have already been indicted in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:02 am by Joel R. Brandes
Michigan, 2018) the matter was before the Court after remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
  For instance, the dangers that the Equal Protection Clause were intended to address reared their ugly head in the Old South after the disastrous 1876 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm by Big Tent Democrat
UCLA, Over 66 (2 units) (the win line is a zillion, too much) MAC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME - Northern Illinois -3½ over Ohio (2 units) Iowa State +10½ over Kansas State (2units), Houston -14 over Southern Mississippi (2 units), Cincinnati -9 over UConn (2 units), Baylor -3 over Texas (3 units) BIG 10 CHAMPIONSHIP GAME - Wisconisn -10 over Michigan State (5 units) SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME - LSU -14 over… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
This case, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on claims of patent infringement, was brought on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
The briefs are flooding in for the Citizens United case, where the Supreme Court unexpectedly ended the Term not by issuing a decision, but by ordering the parties to submit additional briefs on whether the Court should overrule Austin v. [read post]