Search for: "Michigan v. Wisconsin" Results 201 - 220 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
The Michigan Supreme Court took this stance regarding an attorney in a publicized criminal trial, Peisner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
” At the American College of Environmental Lawyers, Renee Cipriano characterizes the Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm by admin
New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan, and New York passed laws prohibiting employers from discriminating against the unemployed when hiring. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:07 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld bans on same-sex marriage in DeBoer v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
In recent years, stun gun bans have also been invalidated or repealed in Michigan, Wisconsin, D.C., the Virgin Islands, Overland Park, Kan., and Annapolis, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Harford County, and Howard County (all in Maryland); the Baltimore City governments is apparently working on the repeal as well, in the wake of a lawsuit. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:20 pm by Benjamin Justus
Clear Skies Nevada was known for a large number of previous copyright infringement filings in Illinois, Michigan and Texas, with lesser numbers of cases in Colorado, Florida and Wisconsin, as reported by Antonelli Law. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Campbell On January 2, 2018, State Attorneys General from eleven states (Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin) (collectively the States) filed a friend of the court brief in Nat’l Ass’n of Wheat Growers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:10 am by Kristen Marcroft
When the Connecticut marriage equality decision — Elizabeth Kerrigan et al v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
AFSCME litigation last term, which concerned whether public employees who did not belong to unions could be required to pay union “agency fees,” the Michigan and Wisconsin SAGs successfully argued to invalidate a law similar to laws in their own states, without informing the court of the connection. [read post]