Search for: "Michigan v. Wisconsin" Results 361 - 380 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am by John Elwood
The Michigan courts rejected this argument; but a federal trial court later granted habeas relief. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Michigan, 14-8106, which raises the same issue, to an as-yet-to-be-determined Conference. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
In Michigan, for example, the progressive advocacy organization Priorities USA sued the state, alleging that Michigan did not have uniform standards for reviewing signatures. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Scott Bomboy
A winning candidate needs 270 votes, and Trump would need to lose recounts in two other states, Michigan and Wisconsin, for the election to change. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
Thousands of bits and pieces of seemingly innocuous information can be analyzed and fitted into place to reveal with startling clarity how the unseen whole must operate (Halkin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:48 am by Nate Persily
The Alabama House and Senate, Indiana House, Iowa House, Maine House and Senate, Michigan House, Minnesota House and Senate, Montana House, New Hampshire House and Senate, North Carolina House and Senate, Ohio House, the Pennsylvania House, and the Wisconsin Assembly and Senate all have flipped from Democrat to Republican. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 5:00 am by Donna Sokol
Ratification by the states began only six days later, with Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin leading the way. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Wisconsin, 15-214, four siblings, were giv [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Roger Clegg
And we found law, undergrad, and med-school discrimination even at the University of Michigan (before voters banned it) – and indeed worse undergrad discrimination than there was in the system that the Supreme Court struck down in Gratz v. [read post]