Search for: "Michigan v. Wisconsin" Results 21 - 40 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2020, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This is significant because the substantive claims in Wisconsin are parallel to the substantive claims made about the elections in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania in various suits, including Texas v. [read post]
Pennsylvania, which had sought to invalidate election results in four swing states that President Donald Trump lost in the November 2020 presidential election, namely Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm by Amy Howe
” In four separate briefs that sometimes used sharp language not normally found in Supreme Court filings, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin urged the justices to stay out of the dispute. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Pennsylvania, a unanimous Supreme Court refused to grant Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton an injunction or other relief that would bar the selection of presidential electors in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Pennsylvania, the audacious effort by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to prevent Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin from selecting presidential electors based upon the results of the November election. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Pennsylvania, the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that seeks to prevent the selection of presidential electors based upon the November election results in four states (Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Thursday at 3 p.m. is the deadline for Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to file responses in Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm by Amy Howe
” Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are scheduled to file their response to Texas’ suit by Thursday at 3 p.m. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:41 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfOn Tuesday, the State of Texas filed a lawsuit ostensibly within the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, naming the states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin as defendants. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Ilya Somin
  Yesterday, the state of Texas filed a lawsuit essentially asking the Supreme Court to reverse the outcome of the presidential election in four key swing states—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, thereby potentially giving Donald Trump a second term he failed to win at the ballot box. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Join for spirited but respectful debate between Professors Chesney and Vladeck as they discuss: The legal basis for a possible presidential action to compel Pfizer to bump the United States ahead of other countries when it comes to accessing vaccine doses beyond the 100 million covered in the current contract Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to get the Supreme Court to adjudicate a claim by Texas that the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and… [read post]