Search for: "Michigan v. Wisconsin"
Results 161 - 180
of 678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Thursday at 3 p.m. is the deadline for Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to file responses in Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
" Chiafalo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
” Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are scheduled to file their response to Texas’ suit by Thursday at 3 p.m. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
Yesterday, the state of Texas filed a lawsuit essentially asking the Supreme Court to reverse the outcome of the presidential election in four key swing states—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, thereby potentially giving Donald Trump a second term he failed to win at the ballot box. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Join for spirited but respectful debate between Professors Chesney and Vladeck as they discuss: The legal basis for a possible presidential action to compel Pfizer to bump the United States ahead of other countries when it comes to accessing vaccine doses beyond the 100 million covered in the current contract Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to get the Supreme Court to adjudicate a claim by Texas that the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and… [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am
Michigan In Donald Trump for President v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 5:31 pm
Michigan: In Costantino v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Each year, scholars at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michigan think tank, use a statistical analysis of available data to estimate smuggling rates for each state.[1] Their most recent report uses 2018 data and finds that smuggling rates generally rise in states after they adopt cigarette tax increases. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:34 am
Trump for President v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 pm
This spring, there were warning signs that with the coronavirus spreading, swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan would not be able to set up and run a vote-by-mail operation of unprecedented scale while simultaneously staffing thousands of polling places among them. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm
Wisconsin: A new federal case was filed challenging the running of the election in Wisconsin: Langenhorst v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am
The NBAM initially covered eight states, but now includes 22 states total: California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
In a case arising out of Wisconsin earlier this week, much attention was paid to a concurring opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who invoked Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
In Michigan, for example, the progressive advocacy organization Priorities USA sued the state, alleging that Michigan did not have uniform standards for reviewing signatures. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
”Here is where Democratic governors will have to stand tall in order to defend democracy.No matter what their legislatures do, the governors of battleground states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and North Carolina are free to communicate to Congress the votes cast by Democratic electors if they reflect the preference of the greatest number of voters in their states.If they do so, this will not be the first time that Congress has been called on to choose between more… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
Finally, 13 states (Delaware, Idaho, Hawaii, Kentucky, Mississippi, New York, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming and West Virginia) do not explicitly specify who can collect and return ballots on the voter’s behalf. [read post]
