Search for: "Mickens v. Mickens"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 8:24 am
Mickens of second-degree murder, […] The post DAMIEN MICKENS v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:10 am
In Mickens v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:45 am
Because the defendant has demonstrated an actual conflict of interest that adversely affected his counsel's performance; see Mickens v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
You see what I'm saying.This isn't actually a post about Walter Mickens, or Mickens v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am
Mickens of the Harvard John A. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:15 pm
Maryland) and post-conviction petitions for relief (Mickens v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:18 pm
The Second Department reaffirmed their prior holding in Mickens v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
This may seem like the ultimate technicality, but it actually applies the Sixth Amendment's right to a public trial.The case is Mickens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:42 am
Our client and his two co-defendants were represented by attorneys working in the same indigent defense office in a rural area.I'd be grateful to receive copies of cert petitions or names of cases in which conflict of interest issues have been raised to the Supreme Court since it decided Mickens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:42 am
Our client and his two co-defendants were represented by attorneys working in the same indigent defense office in a rural area.I'd be grateful to receive copies of cert petitions or names of cases in which conflict of interest issues have been raised to the Supreme Court since it decided Mickens v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Mickens. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:48 am
Welcome to yet another installment of the blog's roundup of summary orders of interest.In Mickens v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 11:26 am
Mickens v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
"This right has been accorded, . . . 'not for its own sake, but because of the effect it has on the ability of the accused to receive a fair trial.'" Mickens v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice Parolee Could Not 'Double-Dip' by Receiving Jail Time Credit Against Both a Prior, New Sentence Mickens v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:13 pm
, Mickens v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:06 pm
The dissent also relied on the Supreme Court's opinion in Mickens v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm
No harm, no foul.You don't have to have a Mickens case, one where nobody can really tell if it mattered, to know why.Because, see, here's the thing, and you can forget who has to prove harm or harmlessness or how strongly, because those are quibbles. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
He claimed his employer both permitted continued discrimination and harassment against him and subsequently fired him because he did not conform to the gender stereotype of what someone who was born female should look and act like (Mickens v. [read post]
