Search for: "Mike Rappaport"
Results 1 - 20
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
And Mike Rappaport offered some thoughts about when governors have to sign constitutional amendments. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:37 pm
Anderson”: Mike Rappaport has this post at “The Originalism Blog. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm
I think Mike is right here on virtually all counts. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:01 pm
This year, Professors Mike Rappaport and Mike Ramsey, put on a double feature about Section 3. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of December 15-21, 2023 Investor Alliances: The Infrastructure For Climate Stewardship Posted by Amelia Miazad (University of California at Davis), on Friday, December 15, 2023 Tags: Climate change, climate risk, ESG, investor stewardship, investors Securities and Derivative Litigation: Quarterly… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of December 15-21, 2023 Investor Alliances: The Infrastructure For Climate Stewardship Posted by Amelia Miazad (University of California at Davis), on Friday, December 15, 2023 Tags: Climate change, climate risk, ESG, investor stewardship, investors Securities and Derivative Litigation: Quarterly… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:25 pm
“The Unnecessary Major Questions Doctrine; When it comes to restraining executive agencies, traditional interpretive canons could do nearly as well as the MQD without departing from originalism”: Mike Rappaport has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
Rev. 71, 98 (2013) (Rappaport). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:57 pm
McGinnis and Mike Rappaport have this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
[Originalist legal scholars Mike Ramsey and Mike Rappaport debate whether the major questions doctrine - an important theory underlying several recent Supreme Court decisions - can be squared with originalism or not.] [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
In contrast, Mike Rappaport and I believe that the expected applications are often good evidence—sometimes the best evidence—of what the text actually meant....Thomas clearly embraces expected applications.I don't think this really captures Balkin's position but it does accurately state the opposition to strong reliance on expected applications by most New Originalists, including Professor Larry Solum. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:03 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: SCOTUS changed oral arguments in part because female justices were interrupted, Sotomayor says (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) A Justice for All Seasons (John McGinnis & Mike Rappaport, Law & Liberty) The Marble Palace Blog: First Questioner (Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal) Supreme Court Seems Ready to Restore Death Sentence for Boston Marathon Bomber (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court signals support to restore death… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
McGinnis and Mike Rappaport have this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:22 pm
Both are examples within the third category. https://t.co/7GJkcRvr2c — Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) May 5, 2021 Here's another libertarian with a similar take: https://t.co/127eVKyfqw — Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) May 5, 2021 Update: Professor Mike Rappaport wrote a relevant essay in January, titled Can a Classical Liberal Support Big Tech Regulation? [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:28 am
Mike Dorf wrote a post titled Testiness at the First Annual Conference on Originalismism. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
But I agree with Mike Rappaport: "Justice Kavanaugh's originalism is by no means proven. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:03 am
” Mike Rappaport has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
“A Nondelegation Doctrine the Court Can Believe In; The Constitution’s original meaning provides a judicially manageable line between constitutional and unconstitutional delegations”: Mike Rappaport has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog. [read post]
