Search for: "Mike Rappaport" Results 81 - 100 of 338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2012, 11:20 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
The critics they speak of, probably include those such as Mike Masnick at TechDirt, who  thinks it is a 'dangerous, innovation harming monstrosity'. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by Cormac Early
Mike Rappaport has further commentary on the review over at the Originalism Blog. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm by David Bernstein
UPDATE: Bonus from the same (Law and Liberty blog): Mike Rappaport takes on Posner’s claim that the original meaning of “freedom of speech” in the First Amendment did not include symbolic speech like flagburning, citing our own Eugene Volokh. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Over at The Originalism Blog, Mike Rappaport responds to a recent essay by Michael Paulsen defending the Chief Justice’s opinion in the healthcare case. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:12 am by uwlegalscholarship
Submissions should be sent to Mike Rappaport (mrappaport@gmail.com); they may be sent now, if possible, but in any event by the end of August. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
At the Originalism Blog, Mike Rappaport continues the analysis of the Chief Justice’s vote in the health care cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
This is what Mike Rappaport labels the third possible interpretation of the opinion. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:20 am by Ted Frank
But, as Mike Rappaport points out, the complaint ignores the post-1937 judicial philosophy that permits judges to ignore the... [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Over on the Liberty Law Blog, Mike Rappaport has this thoughtful post on the left’s concerted push to threaten the legitimacy of a decision invalidating the entire Affordable Care Act: [Jeff Rosen's] comparison with the New Deal is not well taken.  [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:13 am by Lawrence Solum
Submissions should be sent to Mike Rappaport (mrappaport@gmail.com); they may be sent now, if possible, but in any event by the end of August. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:41 pm by Ilya Somin
They also comment on critics like David Friedman, Bryan Caplan, Mike Rappaport, and Todd Seavey, who have expressed related concerns. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:36 pm by Ilya Somin
Regardless of this disagreement, Mike and I agree on the far more important point that the 7 game suspension imposed by the NBA on World Peace was too lenient. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:25 am by Walter Olson
More: Mike Rappaport (noting that the right too has been influenced by legal academia’s “preference for broad overarching theories,” as on originalism), Peter Suderman. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:12 pm by Saul Cornell
Although it is possible that Mike Rappaport and I were simply talking past one another, as David Bernstein suggested, I am inclined to think there is more going on here. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:16 am by Saul Cornell
  Mike Rappaport’s paraphrase of “Physician Heal Thyself” is richly ironic.  [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Saul Cornell
    Mike Rappaport’s Liberty Blog Post claims that a “singular legal concept of the police power”   did not exist in the Founding era.  [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Alfred Brophy
(Readers who are interested in more on this topic may enjoy Saul's article in Dissent, "New Originalism: A Constitutional Scam"): New originalists have a serious historical problem, a fact recently underscored by Mike Rappaport’s post on the Liberty Law Blog.  [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:29 am by Alfred Brophy
In a recent post at Library of Law and Liberty Mike Rappaport writes:  First, it is not clear that the police power concept was in existence as a concept in 1789.   [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE #2: Mike Rappaport has posted a thoughtful response to Sandy’s post here. [read post]