Search for: "Mila Sohoni"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Distinguished Commentators include Richard Albert, Aditya Bamzai, Erin Delaney, Toni Massaro, Neil Siegel, Reva Siegel, and Mila Sohoni. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:53 pm
" My fellow participant was Professor Mila Sohoni, and our moderator was Professor Guy-Uriel Charles. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
. __ (forthcoming 2024), available at SSRN (September 5, 2023)> Mila Sohoni As I write this Jot, it’s entry-level hiring season. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:34 pm
Here is the rundown (in chronological order) with links to the reviews and the underlying papers: Mila Sohoni, Form And Substance In The New Major Questions Doctrine, JOTWELL (January 12, 2023) (reviewing Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Virginia L. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
" Specifically, he concurs with Mila Sohoni, and in the process, disagrees with Sam Bray. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Distinguished commentators for 2024 include:• Richard Albert (Texas) • Aditya Bamzai (Virginia) • Erin Delaney (Northwestern) • Neil Siegel (Duke) • Reva Siegel (Yale)• Mila Sohoni (San Diego)All constitutional law scholars are invited to attend. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Mila Sohoni, The Major Questions Quartet, 136 Harv. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Fred Smith (Emory) reviewing Mila Sohoni, The Puzzle of Procedural Originalism, 72 Duke L.J. 941 (2023), which explores how originalism has not (yet) come for constitutional doctrines in civ pro, such as personal and subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni, The Puzzle of Procedural Originalism, 72 Duke L.J. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
And: The Puzzle of Procedural Originalism by Mila Sohoni. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
Mila Sohoni (University of San Diego School of Law) has posted The Puzzle of Procedural Originalism (72 Duke Law Journal (forthcoming 2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni Readers of Jotwell’s administrative law section need no introduction to the major questions doctrine—either in its older forms, or in its new and more muscular incarnation as a clear statement rule that requires that Congress speak in pellucid terms in order to authorize an agency to regulate a question of “major” significance. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:20 pm
The Major Questions Quartet by Mila Sohoni (136 Harvard Law Review 262 (2022)) Impatient Consumers by Cass Sunstein Congressional Power, Public Rights and Non-Article III Adjudication by John M. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm
Here are ten of my favorite papers from 2022: Data Property by James Grimmelmann & Christina Mulligan Demonizing Our Sisters Through Epistemic Oppression by Yvette Butler The Major Questions Quartet by Mila Sohoni The Misunderstood History of Textualism by Tara Leigh Grove Reasons Holism and the Shared View of Precedent by Torben Spaak "Ruined" by Maybell Romero The Text of the Antitrust Laws by Herbert Hovenkamp: Textualism's Defining Moment by William N. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Here’s a list of the programming that caught me eye, borrowing from Mila Sohoni’s email to the AALS Administrative Law Section for some of these. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm
Walker (45 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 773 (2022)) The Past and Future of the Major Questions Doctrine by Louis Cappozi (84 Ohio State Law Journal forthcoming) The Major Questions Quartet by Mila Sohoni (136 Harvard Law Review 262 (2022)) Inequality and the Value of a Statistical Life by Cass Sunstein Student Loans, Major Questions, and the Dean Wormer Theory of Administrative… [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:00 am
Mila Sohoni (University of San Diego), The Major Questions Quartet, 136 Harv. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: This essay responds to Mila Sohoni, The Major Questions Quartet, 136 Harv. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:43 am
In a recent MQD critique, Professor Mila Sohoni adopts Sunstein’s framework, although she uses the modifiers “old” and “new” in lieu of “weak” and “strong” (respectively). [read post]
