Search for: "Mila Sohoni"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 6:53 pm
" My fellow participant was Professor Mila Sohoni, and our moderator was Professor Guy-Uriel Charles. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni, The Lost History of the “Universal” Injunction, 133 Harv. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
. __ (forthcoming 2024), available at SSRN (September 5, 2023)> Mila Sohoni As I write this Jot, it’s entry-level hiring season. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:30 am
Aaron Nielson and Mila Sohoni provided thoughtful response essays. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni President Donald Trump is a loquacious man. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni There’s a legal black hole at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue where there shouldn’t be—or so argues Professor Kathryn Kovacs in a spirited new article, Constraining the Statutory President. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni “It is hard to sketch a river while sailing midstream,” says Jeff Pojanowski, as he begins an article that does a remarkable job of doing just that. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni Schemes for regulatory reform have taken many different tacks: improving cost-benefit analysis, preventing interest-group capture of the regulatory process, enhancing public participation in rulemaking, and myriad other ideas. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni The “law in books” is often not the same thing as the “law in action. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:20 pm
The Major Questions Quartet by Mila Sohoni (136 Harvard Law Review 262 (2022)) Impatient Consumers by Cass Sunstein Congressional Power, Public Rights and Non-Article III Adjudication by John M. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni Readers of Jotwell’s administrative law section need no introduction to the major questions doctrine—either in its older forms, or in its new and more muscular incarnation as a clear statement rule that requires that Congress speak in pellucid terms in order to authorize an agency to regulate a question of “major” significance. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Mila Sohoni Many an administrative law article ends with a simple and appealing recommendation: “just add accountability! [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
Mila Sohoni previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
BridgesNo Appetite for Change: The Supreme Court Buttresses the State Secrets Privilege, Twice by Robert Chesney Three Hail Marys: Carson, Kennedy, and the Fractured Détente over Religion and Education by Justin Driver The Major Questions Quartet by Mila Sohoni [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
This is a big week for everyone interested in the debate over the scope of injunctions against the federal government, because Professor Mila Sohoni of the University of San Diego Law School has just posted her forthcoming article in the Harvard Law Review called The Lost History of the "Universal" Injunction. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Distinguished commentators for 2024 include:• Richard Albert (Texas) • Aditya Bamzai (Virginia) • Erin Delaney (Northwestern) • Neil Siegel (Duke) • Reva Siegel (Yale)• Mila Sohoni (San Diego)All constitutional law scholars are invited to attend. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 10:07 am
Please direct any questions to Professor Mila Sohoni. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:32 pm
To nominate someone, please send an anonymized version of their work to me, Mila Sohoni, at sohoni@sandiego.edu by September 30, 2022. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 3:21 am
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee comprised of Professors Merritt McAlister (University of Florida Levin College of Law), Richard Re (University of Virginia), Mila Sohoni (University of San Diego School of Law), Steve Vladeck (University of Texas), and Diego Zambrano (Stanford) with the result announced at the Federal Courts section program at the 2023 AALS Annual Meeting. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” In an essay for the Yale Journal on Regulation, Mila Sohoni argues that, “[e]ven if coercion aversion lurks in the backs of their minds, the justices can—and therefore should—resolve King without using the avoidance canon to inaugurate a new branch of federalism jurisprudence. [read post]
