Search for: "Miles v. Apex Marine Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm
Apex Marine Corp., nor the Jones Act altered this understanding, punitive damages for the willful and wanton disregard of themaintenance and cure obligation remain available as a matter ofgeneral maritime law. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 11:34 am by James D. Bercaw
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990), and its limitation on recovery to pecuniary damages, precluded Jones Act seamen from recovering punitive damages either for Jones Act negligence or general maritime law unseaworthiness. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
Apex Marine Corp. paved the way for a general prohibition against “non-pecuniary” damages in seamen’s claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:48 pm by Curt Cutting
Apex Marine Corp., which held that the Jones Act limits a seaman's recovery for unseaworthiness to "pecuniary losses. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Will Bland
Apex Marine Corp., 489 U.S. 19 (1990)). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990), wrote: “It followed Miles‘s reasoning, noting that because the Jones Act limits recovery of punitive damages for actions brought under it, the same result must occur when a Jones Act claim and general maritime claim are joined in the same action. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:18 pm
Apex Marine Corp., which dealt with the damages available to a seaman in a wrongful death case. [read post]