Search for: "Miles v. Apex Marine Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm
Apex Marine Corp., nor the Jones Act altered this understanding, punitive damages for the willful and wanton disregard of themaintenance and cure obligation remain available as a matter ofgeneral maritime law. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
Apex Marine Corp. paved the way for a general prohibition against “non-pecuniary” damages in seamen’s claims. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Will Bland
Apex Marine Corp., 489 U.S. 19 (1990)). [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
APEX Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 111 S.Ct. 317, 112 L.Ed. 2d 275 (1990). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990], or any of this Court's other decisions interpreting the statute. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:18 pm
Apex Marine Corp., which dealt with the damages available to a seaman in a wrongful death case. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990), wrote: “It followed Miles‘s reasoning, noting that because the Jones Act limits recovery of punitive damages for actions brought under it, the same result must occur when a Jones Act claim and general maritime claim are joined in the same action. [read post]