Search for: "Miles v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 1,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
  The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:47 am by Milena Sterio
And what about the ruse orchestrated by United States’ prosecutors to entice Ali into coming to America? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Maritime Law Staff
It is days like today that makes me proud to be a member of the United States Navy and this coalition. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:04 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
The Sixth Circuit has held that this information which provides your location on a certain date and time is not protected by the Fourth Amendment.In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 146 U.S. 140 (1892), because the court improperly limited its inquiry to whether the external contact amounted to a 'communication' and did not investigate the prejudicial effect of the police tail. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm by WIMS
In this Petition for review of two orders of the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Appeal Court ruled by Summary Order which does not have precedential effect. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am by Liskow & Lewis
Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in this landmark case concerning punitive damages. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:49 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Koontz v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:57 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
A news report in the Telegraph states:"At stake is the future livelihood of millions of Bengal and Odisha fishermen, for whom the settlement could open up miles of unchallenged open sea that both India and Bangladesh currently prevent each other from using for anything other than transit. [read post]