Search for: "Miller v. City of Bakersfield" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Second District Upholds EIR for Kern Water Bank Recharge Project Involving Diversion of Unappropriated Kern River Water In Certain Wet Years; Rejects CEQA Claims Alleging Inconsistent Project Description, Inaccurate Environmental Setting, And Inadequate Water Supply Impacts Analysis
24 Mar 2022, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Buena Vista Water Storage District v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court distinguished Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Connecting The CEQA Dots? Supreme Court Holds Friant Ranch Project EIR’s Air Quality Impacts Discussion Insufficiently Relates Pollutant Data To Specific Adverse Human Health Effects
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Does Not Require City’s General Plan Update EIR to Address Urban Decay Based on Broker’s Speculative Opinion Concerning Effects of Commercial Tenant Square Footage Cap
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In reaching these conclusions, and in distinguishing its prior decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds Cap-And-Trade Program Compliance Supports Refinery Project EIR’s Conclusion That GHG Emissions Are Less Than Significant, Also Addresses Important CEQA Baseline and Railroad Operation Preemption Issues
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (My post on the City of Carlsbad case can be found here.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Keeping CEQA In Its Lane: First District Holds Substantial Evidence Supports EIR’s Conclusion That “Urban Decay” Is Not Reasonably Foreseeable Indirect Effect Of Project Relocating Trial Court Operations From Historic Placerville Courthouse
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Law and Media Round Up – 30 January 2017
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Sixth District Rejects SMARA And CEQA Challenges To Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment And Related EIR
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1198.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Rejects CEQA And Fair Transit Hearing Challenges To LA Metro’s Westside Subway Extension Project In Lengthy Published Opinion
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Reaffirms CEQA Is Concerned With Physical Impacts On The Environment, Not Economic Ones On Government Services
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Reaffirms CEQA Is Concerned With Physical Impacts On The Environment, Not Economic Ones On Government Services
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com