Search for: "Miller v. City of Sacramento" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CEQA Review of Sacramento Kings Downtown Arena Project Held Legally Adequate In Published Third District Opinion
23 Feb 2015, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (3d Dist. 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th __, 2015 WL 708608. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Potential bad omens for the defense
28 Oct 2009, 9:12 pm
When jurors ask for and receive a ten-digit adding machine to assist in their deliberations [Sacramento Bee, on the "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" trial, via Miller] Tags: broadcasters, damages, juries Related posts Exact-number demands in lawsuits (1) Zwebner lawsuits on Internet posts (2) Yogi Berra v. [read post]
Overlawyered - http://www.overlawyered.com/
Supreme Court Denies Depublication Requests in CEQA Traffic LOS Impact Case
2 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (3d Dist. 2016) 5 Cal.App. 5th 581. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
What CEQA Gives, The Legislature Can Take Away: Third District Holds Special Legislation For Sacramento Kings Downtown Arena Project Is Constitutional, Upholds Trial Court’s Denial Of Preliminary Injunction
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (Sacramento Basketball Holdings, LLC, RPI) (3d Dist. 2014) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2014 WL 6533058.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sacramento Residential Infill Project EIR Violated CEQA By Basing Less-Than-Significant Traffic Impact Finding Solely On Compliance With General Plan Policy Allowing LOS F
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The City of Sacramento received an early Christmas present with the December 18 publication of the Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Upholds Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) Used Instead Of Traditional CEQA Document To Approve High-Rise, High-Density Mixed-Use Condo Housing Project In Sacramento’s Midtown
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To EIR For Cordova Hills Master Planned Community Project
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Affirms Judgment Invalidating City of Agoura Hills’ Mixed-Use Project Approvals and Related MND Based On CEQA and Local Oak Tree Ordinance Violations
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (City of Long Beach v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Arguing Impacts By Proxy: Fourth District Holds CEQA Does Not Require EIR Absent Evidence That Subdivision Approval Actually Violated Applicable Land Use Regulations Adopted to Mitigate Environmental Impacts
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
San Francisco Beautiful CEQA Decision Interpreting Class 3 Categorical Exemption For Installation of Small Structures Is Ordered Published By First District
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903] and Ocean View [Estates Homeowners Assn, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Appellate specialization help lead to the bench?
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
SACRAMENTO – Governor Edmund G. [read post]
Southern California Appellate News - http://socal-appellate.blogspot.com/
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The case is Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Investors Seek Delay on Access VoteSubmitted by: L. Reed Walton, Publications
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Investor representatives from Sacramento to London joined forces this week to urge the U.S. [read post]
Institutional Shareholder Services - Insight - http://blog.issgovernance.com/
A “Capitol” Offense: Third District Holds State Capitol Building Annex/Visitor Center Protect EIR Violated CEQA Due To Inadequate Project Description And Analyses Of Historical Cultural Impacts, Aesthetics, And Project Alternatives
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 193, 199; South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2018 CEQA Fall Update: Recent Legislative, Judicial, And Other Developments
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm by Arthur F. Coon
 The case is Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Slam Dunked! First District Rejects All CEQA And Land Use Challenges To Golden State Warriors Event Center Project And EIR In Expedited Litigation
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“ROG Won: A CEQA Wars Story” – Third District Holds Geothermal Energy Project EIR’s Rejection Of Proposed Mitigation Measures For Significant ROG Fugitive Emissions Impact Violated CEQA Where No Substantial Evidence Showed Measures’ Infeasibility
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 413, 418; Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com