Search for: "Miller v. Hale"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 6:06 am
The UK Supreme Court has announced that judgment will be handed down in the matters of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry & Ors v Advocate General for Scotland tomorrow morning, Tuesday 24 September 2019, at 10.30am. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lady Hale adjourns the Court for lunch until 14:00. 1303: Lord Pannick QC says authorities on dissolution are not good precedents as this power no longer exists and was personal to the Monarch. 1300: Lord Pannick QC accepts that the authorities sug [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
The Advocate General’s appeal in the case of Cherry is dismissed and Mrs Miller’s appeal is allowed. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Requests Ronan Lavery QC not abuse Lady Hale’s politeness. 11:27: Ronan Lavery QC submits the Government’s policy would be constitutional. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Lady Hale interjects in jest, noting he might have to explain the importance of 1966 (when England won the world cup). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
The case of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland dealt with whether the advice given by the UK Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament (that is, discontinue its session) for a number of days between September and October 2019 was lawful. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
This is a live blog of the third day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
Miller v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
This is a live blog of the fourth day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 186, 189, 204–208 (1946) (payroll records); Hale v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Cuomo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
Is thereno 'justice' in judicata, Mr Miller QC? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 8:43 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
