Search for: "Miller v. Kerr"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Before the New York court unsealed the indictment against former President Donald J. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Two weeks ago, in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
The post Thoughts on <i>Vega v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:33 am
In Illinois v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
[UPDATE: Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate incidents. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
The context is important. 11:29: Lord Kerr again questions the relevance of these submissions to this appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:41 am
Bank One, Tex., N.A. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
Miller, a pedestrian decision relating to information everyone knew was in the hands of third parties, rather than the outcome-dependent decision in Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am
Last June in a 5-4 ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
We therefore doubt that Smith and Miller extend this far. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
