Search for: "Miller v. Municipal Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
On January 11, 2017, the California Supreme Court by unanimous order granted review in yet another CEQA case, Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm
Defendants, David Miller and Donald Miller, were qualified medical marijuana patients along with defendant, Katherine Null, who served as David’s registered medical marijuana primary caregiver. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
MILLER v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:36 pm
Accordingly, CM requested that the Court immediately order the Town to issue a temporary ABL and also issue employee Timothy Miller a temporary ABEL. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood Assn. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
Miller v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
Law Lessons from PATRICIA POLITI, n/k/a PATRICIA DEPASQUE MILLER V. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Miller v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:52 am
Miller was convicted and appeal from the municipal court to the district court, which affirmed her conviction. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:19 am
To the extent that the Miller's claims fall outside of the scope of the collective bargaining agreement, she failed to serve a notice of claim on the County as required by Section 50-e(1)(a) of the General Municipal Law. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:54 pm
Additional Resources: Miller v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
On August 22, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Paul Cheatham I.R.A. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:53 pm
Gillespie County, the only case left from the Supreme Court's March sitting is D.C. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Judge Miller recommended termination of A.M. employment. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:39 am
See Miller v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:18 am
An important reminder from a recent Iowa Supreme Court decision; some lawyers know this point well, but many don't.From Behm v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
In anticipation of Monday’s oral argument, Supreme Court coverage and commentary focuses on Janus v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:03 am
The trial court took away that verdict, and now the case has been handed off the New York Court of Appeals to decide a tricky state law question.The case is Ferreira v. [read post]
