Search for: "Miller v. Railroad Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am by John McFarland
This commission, the Bourland and Miller Commission, began its work in 1850 and finished in 1852. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
North Coast Railroad Authority (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 85, which held that CEQA does not apply to railroad operations because the statute is preempted by federal law (the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act or “ICCTA,” 49 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, the high court held that CEQA applied to a state public entity’s railroad project on a State-owned rail line as an act of “self-governance,” and was not a preempted “regulation” (i.e., not an “environmental preclearance requirement”) under the Federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
In Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]