Search for: "Miller v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
While YouTube may have had a moral or ethical responsibility to protect its users from Defendants’ allegedly fraudulent schemes, Plaintiffs’ claim that it had a legal duty to do so is preempted by the CDA. * Smith v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
Historians, often of the subspecies social, labor, or Marxist, have frequently been recruited by the lawsuit industry to support their litigation efforts. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And their lack of choice, under Smith and Miller, would have had no effect on the Court’s holding. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:41 am
Chris Miller, an excellent former student of mine, has pointed out Woods v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19… [read post]