Search for: "Miller v. Stewart" Results 121 - 140 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:11 am
Justice Stewart’s famous epigram in his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Three issues in particular bedeviled the justices that year: obscenity, abortion and the status of women under the Equal Protection Clause.In Miller v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am by Bart Torvik
" The current standard on obscenity, set out in Miller v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
The case settled on 30 May 2012 and the defendant, Colin Sullivan, agreed to pay damages of £50,000 to solicitor Stewart Wiseman. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Leland E. Beck
– Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The same judge made the judgment in Miller v Associated Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2677 (QB)) available last week. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:28 am by Walter Olson
” [WKMG Orlando] Retired Justice John Paul Stevens isn’t buying the “Thomas should recuse” meme [USA Today via Legal Ethics Forum] Not COPPA-cetic: among other unintended consequences, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has encouraged parents to help kids to falsify ages online [Danah Boyd via Jim Harper, Suderman, Reason, Stewart Baker, earlier] Lawmaking from the bench: Maryland high court strikes down law limiting landlords’ lead paint… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
It began when Stewart reported on counter-terrorism raids in 2009. [read post]