Search for: "Miller v. Texas" Results 61 - 80 of 599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
MILLER, District Judge.Pending before the court is defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s ("BANA") motion to dismiss a suit filed by plaintiff Michael Guerrero (Dkt. 1-1, Ex. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:51 pm by The Recorder
[Amy Miller] Jurors might have awarded Commil USA more than $3.7 million in damages for patent infringement if defense counsel for Cisco Systems hadn’t made allegedly anti-Semitic comments during the trial, a federal in Marshal, Texas, has decided. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Henry Miller urges the court to review Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
To me, eventually the entire third-party doctrine spawned from the court's Smith and Miller cases in the '70s (see here for an example of an Obama apologist using those cases to justify the NSA gobbling up everyone's cell-phone metadata ) must be reconsidered in light of the advent of cloud computing in the digital age, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor rightly argued in US v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But clearly most of the legislators on the dais hadn't been exposed to such attitudes.They were debating SB 23 remaking sentences for capital offenses committed by juveniles to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
It's always nice, and far too rare, to see a prosecutor slapped around for being a heavy-handed, moralistic, jackass.And so we turn to Miller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
Louisiana, in which the Court will consider whether its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
Louisiana, holding that the Court’s 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is from a 2003 case styled, New York Life Insurance Company, et al v. [read post]