Search for: "Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad Co."
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 12:24 pm
I wonder, doctrinally, if Justice Nicholson -- as well as his predecessors (Justice Nicholson relies a lot for his holding on Miller, a California case from 2007) is thinking about this the right way. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Capato Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit sided with Union Pacific Railroad on virtually identical facts, holding that stock-option income is not taxable under the RRTA. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
He also wrote the majority opinion in 1869 in Pacific Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
