Search for: "Miller v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 2,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 6:53 am by PaulKostro
That doctrine was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Hickman v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Comm’r,489 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States case) is a bit more complicated than might appear at first blush.Let’s start with a simple part: to the extent that the president was asserting that he could seek review of any impeachment proceedings directly in the Supreme Court before any lower court had looked at the matter, his assertion would run smack dab into the most venerable of Supreme Court rulings, the 1803 case of Marbury v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
From 1968 to 1971, he served in the United States Army, including a tour in Vietnam. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm by Mark Tushnet
IMS Health, Citizens United), and of course Muslims against racist policies (Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Alethea Redfern
 In the Courts Miller and Others v The United Kingdom [2019] ECHR 285 (11 April 2019): The applicants complained that under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that as convicted  prisoners in detention they had been subject to a blanket ban on voting in elections. [read post]