Search for: "Miller v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 2,093
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2019, 4:43 pm by David Adelstein
  See Prince Payne Enterprises, Inc. f/u/b/o Prince Payne Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am by Amy Howe
Robles, involving whether the accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites and apps; Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Kalvis Golde
Simmons (joined by Stevens), rendering minors ineligible for the death sentence, was bolstered by its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Section 10 demonstrates the goodwill of Parliament that Parliament can and will function to protect the interests of each part of the United Kingdom, even in the absence of meaningful representation in Westminster. 11:25: Ronan Lavery QC says absence of consideration of NI in these circumstances is gross. 11:21:& [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]