Search for: "Mills v. Scott" Results 21 - 40 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 11:28 am by Danielle D'Onfro
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Rotkiske v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Concluding that Applicant Scott Stawski was not entitled to concurrent use registrations for the marks PROSPER ESTATE and PROSPER RIDGE for wines, the Board dissolved this concurrent use proceeding. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Businesses pay the greater of 7.5 percent of net income (no cap) or 3.1 mills on the value of their capital stock up to a cap of $1 million in capital stock tax liability. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Del Mar Financial Service] Family speaks out after local motels hit with Scott Johnson ADA suits [Allison Levitsky, Palo Alto (Calif.) [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Origin of the Ohio CAT Ohio’s Commercial Activity Tax is imposed at a rate of 2.6 mills (0.26 percent) on business gross receipts in excess of $1 million. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Having cited Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and other cases on the topic, the court in its judgment emphasised the importance of the principle of open justice (that justice should be seen to be done) and ruled that, by failing to consult the judiciary before excluding members of the public from the courtroom during the trial, the magistrates court staff had acted unlawfully, and in consequence no valid proceedings had taken place. [read post]