Search for: "Mills v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 884
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Indeed, we have previously recognized that administrative searches are not rendered invalid because they are accompanied by some degree of suspicion, see Bruce, 498 F.3d at 1242, and the Supreme Court has similarly noted that suspicion of criminal activity will not defeat an otherwise permissible administrative search, see United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She is a legend, going back to her work on the LCO treaty rights cases in Wisconsin, the LeBlanc matter in Michigan, and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It thus became the third federal appeals court to reach that result; so far, no federal court at that level has upheld a ban in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher Michigan State University College of Law Abstract: In Michigan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
My starting disposition is to really not want parents to "kidnap" their kids from other countries and bring them back to the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am by Donald Thompson
 In United States v Davis, 726 F3d 357 [2nd Cir 2013], defendant was federally charged with assaulting another inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which the government alleged was “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” an element of that offense. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:43 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Div., Lansing 2014 Tecumseh Peacekeeping Award recipient:  Assistant United States Attorney Jeff J. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]