Search for: "Mills v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States’ Argument Ed Kneedler argued for the United States here, and the argument was a delight for law professors like me. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:34 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Class action litigation over food product labels is rapidly emerging around the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:26 pm by H. Scott Leviant
” Id. at 1533 (Kagan, J., dissenting); accord Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Affirmance, Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance:  The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2013-08-26 Defendant State_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (3) Affirmation in Support of State Defendant_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (2) Exhibit A – Amended Answer and Counterclaim (3) Exhibit B – letters from Banks (3) Exhibit C – 2012-05-24 Statement by Counsel (3) Exhibit D 2013-07-11 Chief_s Correspondence to FERC (2) US intervention materials here. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action — federal Fair Housing Act’s application to disparate-impact discrimination claims No. 12-1038 — United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bay Mills Indian Community–a case granted review by the Court even though the United States had filed a brief recommending that cert be denied. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, “Ringleader of Massive Immigration Fraud Mill Pleads Guilty In Manhat [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 11:03 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Harcourt (University of Chicago - Department of Political Science) has posted The Collapse of the Harm Principle Redux: On Same-Sex Marriage, the Supreme Court's Opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm by Mark Litwak
Mills, chief judge of the United States District Court Northern District of Mississippi, found in favor of Sony and dismissed the complaint. [read post]